Hendricks v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Tilford
Affirming.
At the outset it is necessary to note the fact that in the statement of appeal which we have followed in captioning this opinion, the actual appellees are designated as appellants, and the actual appellants, as appellees. While this error would justify us in dismissing the appeal, we have concluded, since counsel have not raised the point, to ignore the error, although, in the interest of clarity, it is necessary in expressing our views to refer to the named'appellees as appellants and to the named appellants as appellees.
With this explanation, we…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bullock v. Gay, Adm'r, Etc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Grigsby v. GrigsbyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Collett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
- Singleton v. SingletonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Hoopes Bros. & Thomas Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ligon v. Redding Kirkwood v. SameCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
- McKinney v. ChastainCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Reffett v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965
- Territory of Alaska v. BurkeDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1956