Legal Opinion

Platt v. Sherry

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1831PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from the Clinton common pleas. Platt sued Sherry in a justice’s court, in an action on the case', for malfeasance as a constable, and the cause was removed by appeal into the. common pleas.

Read the full summary

Error from the Clinton common pleas. Platt sued Sherry in a justice’s court, in an action on the case', for malfeasance as a constable, and the cause was removed by appeal into the. common pleas. An execution on a judgment in favor of Platt against one Cochran, was put into Sherry’s hands, with directions to levy it on the property of Cochran ; he did levy on some property, and after doing so, informed an agent of the plaintiff that he was afraid that the property did not belong to Cochran, but did not ask for any indemnity ; subsequently, without selling the property, he committed Cochran to…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Nelson, J.

The common pleas, in nonsuiting the plaintiff, were probably governed by the case of Pierce v. Sheldon, 13 Johns. R. 191, which was an action on the case, for neglecting to serve or return the execution within the limited time, and the judgment was reversed for a misconception of the action. No reason or authority is given for this decision, except that the statute provided a remedy expressly “ by action of debt.” 1 R. L. 395. Laws of 1824, p. 289, § 17. In this case the action is founded upon the express malfeasance of the officer in making a levy upon property…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jones v. HuterAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1929
  2. Blakely v. WeaverNew York Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Clark v. WoodruffNew York Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Hiscock v. TuckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  5. Irving v. BrittonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API