Legal Opinion

Jones v. Huter

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 22, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Judgment unanimously reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event. The defendant, a city marshal, was not entitled to an indemnity bond from the plaintiff until the claim of the third party had been established, as provided for by sections 696 and 697 *50of the Civil Practice Act. (Curtis v. Patterson, 8 Cow. 65; Williams v. Lowndes, 1 N. Y. Super. Ct. 579; Platt v. Sherry, 7 Wend. 236; Craft v. Brandow, 24 Misc. 306, 307.) The execution delivered to the marshal on December ninth was a lien upon the car under section 679 of the Civil…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baker v. HullNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Leadbetter v. N. H. LeadbetterNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Ledyard v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  4. Bowman v. CornellNew York Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Curtis v. PattersonCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1827

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. B. Altman & Co. v. Broad Park Plaza Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  2. Huss v. Plumbers' Supply House, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API