Legal Opinion

Draughn v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided July 15, 1916No. A-2499PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court, Marshall County; Jesse M. Hatchett, Judge. I. D. Draughn was convicted of rape, and brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBrett, J.

Plaintiff in error in this case, who will be-referred to as defendant, was convicted in the district court of 'Marshall county of rape, and sentenced to seven years in the penitentiary. He was prosecuted and convicted under subdivision 8, Section 2414, Revised Laws, 1910, which provides that rape is an act of sexual intercourse accomplished with a female, not the wife of the perpetrator:

“Where she submits under the belief that the person committing the act is her husband, and this belief is induced by artifice, pretense or concealment practiced by the accused, or by the accused in collusion…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hynes v. . McDermottNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Meister v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Reaves v. ReavesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  4. In Re Love's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Hargroves v. ThompsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1856

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mudd v. PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. State v. NavarroArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Harvey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Nichols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Holz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API