Legal Opinion
Harvey v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided August 11, 1925No. A-4959PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
The plaintiff in error will be referred to as defendant, as in the court below.
The defendant was charged by information with the crime of bigamy. A jury was waived, and a stipulation of facts entered into, and the case submitted to the court on such stipulation.
Upon the undisputed facts as set out in the stipulation, it appears that the defendant is a muchly married individual, and given time would surpass the record of Henry VIII. The facts are about as follows: In December, 1920, the defendant, Harvey, obtained a divorce at Tulsa from Mrs. Harvey, I. On February 12, 1921, Mrs. Adams…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Thormann v. FrameSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Mudd v. PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Castleberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
- Estate of StullSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hall v. BaylousWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1930
- Mantz v. GillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Smith v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Sanders v. SandersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Ex Parte GreshamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.