Legal Opinion
McWhorter v. Stein
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 11, 1933No. 23322PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.
The sustaining of a certiorari and granting of a new trial for the first time, where the verdict is not demanded by the evidence, will not be disturbed by this court. Shirley v. Swafford, 119 Ga. 43 (45 S. E. 722); Gresham v. Lee, 28 Ga. App. 576 (112 S. E. 524); Cox v. *839Grady, 132 Ga. 368 (64 S. E. 262) ; Smith v. Williamson, 43 Ga. App. 702 (159 S. E. 912) ; Murray v. Stribling, 28 Ga. App. 211 (110 S. E. 761); Nickajack Milling Co. v. International Vegetable Oil Co., 26 Ga. App. 473 (106 S. E. 300).
Decided November 11, 1933. Thomas E. Scott, for plaintiff in error. Bryan, Middlebroolcs &…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cox v. GradySupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Shirley v. SwaffordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Gresham v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Nickajack Milling & Grain Co. v. International Vegetable Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Murray v. StriblingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burnum v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Hurt v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Peacock v. American Plant Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934