Legal Opinion
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Union Pacific Railroad
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided January 23, 1998No. 96-0282-E-BLWPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WINMILL, District Judge.
The Court has before it a Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has examined the Report pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and finds that it accurately sets forth the facts and correctly applies the governing legal standards, the objections of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad (“UPRR”)' notwithstanding.
UPRR objects to the following conclusions of the Report: (1) that Barry Warburton’s major -life activity of seeing is impaired on account of his monocular vision; (2) that UPRR treated Warburton as if he were disabled by his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Royce Doane v. City of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Phillip T. Still v. Freeport-Mcmoran, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Exxon Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1997
3Cited by5 opinions
- Albertson's, Inc. v. KirkingburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Vera L. Nunes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Mike Black Rita SilvaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Rooney v. Sprague Energy Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 2007
- Albertson's, Inc. v. KirkingburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Quechan Indian Tribe v. USADistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024