Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Manning v. Atlantic & Yadkin Railway Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided December 3, 1924PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1ConcurrenceClarkson, J.
The plaintiff's material allegations, as they appear in the complaint, the exhibits, and the references, are substantially as herein stated. In 1852 the General Assembly incorporated the Western Railroad Company, which was authorized to build a railroad between the town of Fayetteville and the coal region in the counties of Moore and Chatham (Laws 1852, ch. 147); and at a subsequent session it passed an act under which the county of Cumberland and the town of Fayetteville each subscribed $100,000. Laws 1856-57, ch. 71. There were also individual subscriptions to the amount of $134,400. Under…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Thomas v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Pearsall v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Oregon Railway & Navigation Co. v. Oregonian Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ames v. American National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- Rowan County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- State Ex Rel. North Carolina Milk Commission v. National Food Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Leonard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Unemployment Compensation Commission v. City Ice & Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.