Philippine Packing Corp. v. Maritime Co. of the Philippines
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In these separate admiralty appeals involving similar issues, plaintiff Philippine Packing Corporation (PPC) challenges the district court’s orders dismissing PPC’s respective complaints for loss of and damage to cargo under the doctrine of forum non conveniens. We affirm.
In each suit, both the plaintiff and defendant are Philippine corporations; the carriage of cargo was a direct shipment originating in Japan and destined for a port in the Philippines;1 and the contract of carriage — a bill of lading issued in Japan — provided that its terms be governed by Japanese law supplemented,…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Langnes v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Swift & Co. Packers v. Compania Colombiana Del Caribe, S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Canada Malting Co. v. Paterson Steamships, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- The BelgenlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Veba-Chemie A.G. v. M/v Getafix, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., in Rem, and Getafix Shipping Corp., in PersonamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Union Insurance Society Of Canton v. S.S. ElikonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Union Insurance Society v. ElikonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Philippine Packing Corporation, a Corporation v. Maritime Company of the Philippines, Vessel Dynamic Venture, Her Hull, MacHinery Tackle and Apparel, Philippine Packing Corporation, a Corporation v. Maritime Company of the Philippines, Vessel Tagalog, Her Hull, MacHinery Tackle and ApparelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975