Legal Opinion

State v. Haith

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 19, 1980No. 8018SC105PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

Defendant’s first assignment of error is that the court erred in failing to charge the jury that they could find the defendant guilty of involuntary manslaughter. In State v. Wrenn, 279 N.C. 676, 681, 185 S.E. 2d 129, 132 (1971), Mr. Justice Huskins, writing for the Court, explained:

“Where, under the bill of indictment, it is permissible to convict defendant of a lesser degree of the crime charged, and there is evidence to support a milder verdict, defendant is entitled to have the different permissible verdicts arising on the evidence presented to the jury under proper…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. FoustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. State v. WrennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. McKennaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. McCallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. CastorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HoyleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API