Legal Opinion

Bank of Centerville v. Larson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1924No. File No. 5410PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDillo'N, J.

This" is an action to recover on a promissory note executed by defendant. Plaintiff alleges that defendant thereafter executed the following instrument:

“Oct. 31st, 1919.
“To the Bank of Centerville: You are at liberty to purchase my note of this date for $12,500 if you desire. There are no offsets or conditions against this note. F. O. Larson.”

And the plaintiff, believing defendant had no defense to the payment of said note, was induced to and did purchase the same in good faith for a valuable consideration.

Defendant specifically denied that he signed or executed the note sued on, or the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seattle National Bank v. CarterWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Crabtree v. AtchisonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
  3. Plummer v. Farmers BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Henry v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dakota Partners, L.L.P. v. Glopak, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Security Holding Co. v. ChristensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  3. State v. JensenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Bank of Centerville v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API