Legal Opinion

Dakota Partners, L.L.P. v. Glopak, Inc.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 2001No. 20010092PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Dakota Partners appealed from a South Central District Court judgment denying its breach of contract claims. Concluding the offsets clause in the adden-dums to the contract did not stop Glopak from asserting the defense of fraud, we affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Ray Larson and his sons, Michael and Robert Larson (“the Larsons”), contacted Glopak, Inc., in an effort to sell it the intellectual property rights to their “bag and straw” invention. The “bag and straw” allows single-serving beverages in a small pouch to be easily accessed with the enclosed straw. Glopak purchased the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Verry v. MurphyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. KinseyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Egeland v. Continental Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Martin v. Allianz Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. LaRoqueNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shelby Elec. Co., Inc. v. ForbesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  2. Forbes Equity Exchange, Inc. v. JensenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Jordet v. JordetNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. JensenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. FA ND Chev, LLC v. KupperDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API