Legal Opinion

Board of Education v. A, C & S, INC.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 1, 1988No. 86-817PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNAMARA

Plaintiffs, 34 Illinois public school districts are required by the Asbestos Abatement Act (Act) (111. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 122, par. 1401 et seq.) to replace all asbestos-containing products in their buildings, for which they may receive some reimbursement from the State. Plaintiffs seek full reimbursement and additional damages from the 78 named defendants, which either mined, manufactured, installed or sold the product.

In a consolidated action, the trial court dismissed plaintiffs’ complaints with prejudice and without leave to amend. Plaintiffs appeal from the dismissal of the complaints…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Wyandotte Transportation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. A, C and S, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Washington Water Power Co. v. Graybar Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co v. Wilkin Insulation Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  4. Pulte Home Corp., Inc. v. Ply Gem Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1992
  5. Gerdes v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API