Legal Opinion

Meadow v. Civil Service Board

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1989No. 19550Published

1Opinion of the Court

*625OPINION

By the Court,

Young, C. J.:

Appellant argues that because the board considered allegedly improper evidence of a polygraph examination, the district court erred when it affirmed the board’s decision. However, we need not address the admissibility of the polygraph evidence because the board heard other substantial evidence supporting its decision to uphold Meadow’s termination.

Meadow underwent a polygraph examination in connection with an arrest made by him in September 1987. Donnell Wells charged that Meadow used excessive force when making the arrest. The examination was to verify…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Gandy v. State Ex Rel. Division of Investigation & NarcoticsNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Bezuneh v. UrlacherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API