Legal Opinion

Bezuneh v. Urlacher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 14, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

— Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed without costs. Memorandum: The Hearing Officer improperly received in evidence the results of the polygraph test administered to petitioner since no proper foundation established the reliability of the particular machine used and its proper functioning on the day the test was given. Further, the qualifications of the person who administered the test to petitioner were never demonstrated (see, Matter of Sowa v Looney, 23 NY2d 329, 333-334; cf., May v Shaw, 79 AD2d 970). The erroneous reception of this evidence, however, does not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Sowa v. LooneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. May v. ShawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Abramson v. UrlackerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Green Cab & Brokerage Co. v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Meadow v. Civil Service BoardNevada Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API