Legal Opinion
Arbitration Between R3 Aerospace, Inc. v. Marshall of Cambridge Aerospace Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 29, 1996No. 96 Civ. 1171 (WCC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge:
Petitioner R3 Aerospace, Inc. (“R3”) commenced a Special Proceeding in the Supreme Court of the State of New York seeking to disqualify the law firm of Haight, Gardner, Poor & Havens (“HGPH”) from representing respondent Marshall of Cambridge Aerospace Limited (“Marshall”) in an arbitration proceeding because of alleged violations of New York’s Code of Professional Responsibility and Disciplinary Rules. Marshall removed, asserting that the district court has original jurisdiction over this action pursuant to the Convention on the Recognition and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Roy A. Somlyo v. J. Lu-Rob Enterprises, Inc. And Louis G. BondCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- R. G. Barry Corporation v. Mushroom Makers, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Reed & Martin, Inc., D/B/A International Constructors, Appellant-Respondent, and Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Appellee-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Munich Reinsurance America, Inc. v. ACE Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Croushore v. Buchanan Ingersoll P.C., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1996
- Simply Fit of North America, Inc. v. PoynerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Kenney, Becker LLP v. KenneyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007