Legal Opinion

Air Turbine Technology, Inc. v. Atlas Copco AB

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided September 3, 2003No. 01-8288-CIVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EXPEDITED MOTION TO COMPEL VIDEO CONFERENCE TESTIMONY AT TRIAL

MARRA, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs Expedited Motion to Compel Video Conference Testimony at Trial [filed August 28, 2003]. The Court has carefully considered the motion and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.

Plaintiff seeks this Court to compel Defendants to produce their employee witnesses who are located beyond the subpoena power of this Court to testify at trial via live video conference. In support of this motion, Plaintiff relies upon In re San Juan Dupont…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gillars v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  2. In re San Juan Dupont Plaza Hotel Fire LitigationDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Air Turbine Technology, Inc. v. Atlas Copco Ab, Atlas Copco Tools Ab, Atlas Copco North America, Inc., and Atlas Copco Tools, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Air Turbine Technology v. Atlas Copco AbCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  3. Markwood Investments Ltd. v. Neves (In re Neves)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2014
  4. Watkins Family Trust Dated 1/7/94 v. WB (Brant) Wallace, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API