Harrison State Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHonorable Charles B. Elwell, District Judge
sitting in place of MR. JUSTICE STEWART, disqualified, delivered the opinion of the court.
This action arises out of two separate policies of burglary and robbery insurance, issued by the respective defendants to the plaintiff bank, each in the amount of $10,000, and each containing a provision that, if the assured carried other insurance covering the loss, the assured should not recover from the company a larger proportion of any such loss than the amount applicable thereto bears to the total amount of all valid and collectible insurance covering such loss. The policy of the National Surety…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Griswold v. HazardSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Benedict v. . ArnouxNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- McKenzie v. Scottish Union & National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Burgess v. Charles A. Wing Agency, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
- Gise v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Boston Five Cents Savings Bank v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Uslife Credit Life Insurance v. McAfeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio v. CONREAL LLCDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2010
- Stone v. National Surety CorporationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962
- Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. v. CaramadreDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.