Legal Opinion

Dockter v. Dockter

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 2018No. 20180131PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jensen, Justice.

[¶1] Shane Dockter appeals from orders denying his N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to vacate a default judgment asserting that the default judgment was either void or should be vacated for excusable neglect. Applying the limited standard for reviewing denial of motions to vacate default judgments, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion and we affirm the orders denying the motion.

I

[¶2] Brandon and Shane Dockter are brothers. In 2007, the brothers formed a partnership to facilitate a joint farming operation. In conjunction with the formation of the partnership the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Perdue v. ShermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Gepner v. Fujicolor Processing, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State Bank of Towner v. HansenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sargent County Water Resource District v. MathewsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Oden v. Minot Builders SupplyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Don's Garden Center v. The Garden DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API