Mullins v. Ritchie Grocer Company
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, C. J.,
(after stating the facts). The principal question involved upon the appeal is whether or not under proof of the facts stated, the court should have submitted the case to the jury. In case-notes to 17 A. L. R. 623, and 29 A. L. R. 470, the general rule is stated that, in order to hold an employer liable for injuries by an automobile while being driven by or for a salesman or collector, the relation of master and servant must exist, and the servant must, at the time, have been acting within the scope of his employment in performing an act for the master’s benefit. Among the cases…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Potts v. . PardeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Morier v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Guthrie v. HolmesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
- Healey v. CockrillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Terry Dairy Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.