Legal Opinion

Simpson v. CONSOLIDATED CONSTRUCTION SERVICES

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 6, 2002No. 1960 Sept. Term, 1999, and 523 Sept. Term, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Sept. Term, 1999, and Sept. Term, 2000.

1Opinion of the Court

KRAUSER, Judge.

A debtor must be just before he is generous. Unfortunately, that principle was not observed here. Appellee and judgment debtor, New Panorama Development Corporation (“New Panorama”), used a settlement agreement, resolving lawsuits it had filed against its contractors, to direct that settlement funds, contributed by those contractors, be used to pay its legal fees and one of its contractors, at the expense of its judgment creditors. Payment was then made by those contractors to a settlement fund, created by that agreement, even though writs of garnishment had been served on all…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Heat & Power Corp. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Oaks v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. Philip Morris Inc. v. AngelettiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Condon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Frost v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Consolidated Construction Services, Inc. v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. Utica Mutual Ins. Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Del Marr v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Doe v. Alternative Medicine Maryland, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  5. Harbor Bank v. Hanlon Park Condominium Ass'nCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API