Legal Opinion
Popovich v. Empire Beauty Schools, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 22, 1983No. Civ. A. 82-5741PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TROUTMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff instituted this action for injuries which she allegedly sustained while receiving a permanent wave and other special hair treatments from defendant, Empire Beauty Schools, Inc. (Empire). Specifically, plaintiff alleges that as a result of defendant’s negligent use of various chemicals, she suffered burning and blistering of the scalp, loss of hair, other specified physical maladies and emotional distress. Moving to dismiss, Empire argues that plaintiff’s execution of a release prior to her receipt of the permanent bars this action. We…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ness v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Three Rivers Motors Company v. The Ford Motor Company and Auto Lite CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Evans v. MarksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Townsend v. Columbia OperationsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Nasser v. City of HomewoodCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan (In Re Kaplan)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- In Re FRG, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Williams v. StoneDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996