Legal Opinion
George C. Miller Brick Co. v. Stark Ceramics, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 18, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Kenneth R. Fisher, J.
In 1995, plaintiff George C. Miller Brick Co., Inc., a distributor of brick and tile products, commenced this antitrust action under the Donnelly Act (General Business Law § 340 et seq.) against a supplier, defendant Stark Ceramics, Inc., seeking treble damages based on allegations of bid rigging and price fixing in April 1991 in connection with the award of a contract for *153structural glazed facing tile on a construction project at the Albion Correctional Facility. The matter has been bifurcated for trial, the court (Stander, J.) having previously…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- National Gear & Piston, Inc. v. Cummins Power Systems, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012