Legal Opinion

Post v. Dillane

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 5, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

This is an appeal from the denial of a petition brought by certain electors of the city of Waterbury seeking the removal from office of the registrars and deputy-registrars of voters of that city. Section 708 of the General Statutes provides that, upon the bringing of such a petition, requesting the removal of any registrar or deputy registrar “by reason of any violation of any . . . law relating to caucuses and primaries” the court shall proceed to hear the matter and “if such registrar or deputy registrar shall be found to have violated any of such provisions” the court shall declare his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. TuftsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. State v. WelshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  3. State ex rel. Timothy v. HowseTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Tibbs v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Bolton v. TullySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Pape v. DunaisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  2. People's Party of Connecticut v. DawsonConnecticut Superior Court · 1948
  3. State Ex Rel. Morano v. KlumppConnecticut Superior Court · 1961
  4. Wilson v. Council of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API