Legal Opinion

North Slope Technical, Ltd. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 31, 1992No. 90-757CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

After oral argument on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment and on defendant’s motion to dismiss, the court granted the motion to dismiss the insurance carrier as a named party, and denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. See Order of December 4, 1992. This opinion deals with the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The motion raises the question of whether a contractor’s right to recover against the Government is diminished to the extent the contractor has been paid for the loss through a builders’ all-risk insurance policy that it elected to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Erickson Air Crane Company of Washington, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans Railroad v. Pullman Southern Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. William A. Ransom and Robert D. Nesen v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  4. Bruce Construction Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  5. United States v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hughes Communications Galaxy, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  2. Federal Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  3. Alta Wind I Owner Lessor C v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  4. Alta Wind I Owner Lessor C v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  5. Pacific Wind LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API