Legal Opinion

Hughes v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1874PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Travis. Tried below before the Hon. J. P. Richardson. The facts are set out in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Moore, Associate Justice.

This suit originated in the District Court of Travis county by a petition filed by the District Attorney, in the name of the State of Texas, to escheat two tracts of land, one of six hundred and forty acres, situated in said Travis county, the other of eight hundred and thirty-five acres, situated in Llano county, alleged to have been the property in his lifetime of one R. S. M. A. de la Tulle.

Title to land by escheat originated from and was a consequence of the feudal law, whereby, upon the failure of heirs of the person last seized, who may lawfully take the estate…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Day Land & Cattle Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Hamilton v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. American Loan & Trust Co. v. Grand Rivers Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky · 1908
  4. In re Estate of MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. T., B. & H. R'y Co. v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API