Legal Opinion

Garren v. Commercial Union Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 10, 1976PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The controlling principle in this case is that, in a negligence action brought by an injured employee against third parties pursuant to Code of Ala., Tit. 26, §§ 312 and 313 (42), the statute of limitations begins to run from the date of the injury, which is defined in § 313 (42) as the date of the last exposure to the hazards of the disease which gave rise to the injury. We find the trial court's judgment in accord with this principle and affirm.

Plaintiff, Mildred Garren, claims to be permanently and totally disabled as a consequence of continuously breathing dust and lint discharged from a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. HammettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  2. Lehigh Portland Cement Co. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Birmingham Electric Co. v. MeachamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. RigdonDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1976
  5. Birmingham Electric Co. v. MeachamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1937

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Garrett v. Raytheon Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Griffin v. Unocal Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  3. Beasley v. Alabama State UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997
  4. Cline v. Ashland, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  5. Chrysler Corp. v. HenleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API