Legal Opinion

People v. Cogar

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 17, 1962No. Crim. 3327PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial and from a judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict which found appellant guilty of violation of Penal Code section 261, subdivision 1 (statutory rape), violation of Penal Code section 286 (sodomy) and violation of Penal Code section 288 (child molestation). Appellant, however, limits his argument to the alleged insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict on the counts charging sodomy and child molestation. Our review of the record convinces us the evidence was abundantly sufficient on all three counts.

The victim is the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. NothnagelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. People v. PiccionelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. People v. ParisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. People v. StampherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. PG&E Corporation v. AECOM Technical Services, Inc..District Court, N.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API