Legal Opinion

Aetna Insurance Co. v. Paulk

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 6, 1969No. 44663PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pannell, Judge.

Where the terms of a fire insurance policy prohibit the bringing of an action thereon after more than one year from the date of the loss, such provision in the policy is binding on the parties thereto, and a condition precedent to a recovery on the policy (see General Ins. Co. v. Lee Chocolate Co., 97 Ga. App. 588 (103 SE2d 632) and cases therein cited), unless the same be waived under the terms of the policy or the insurer has led the insured to believe that the insured will be paid without suit by its actions in negotiating for settlement or direct promises to pay. See…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hartford Fire Insurance v. AmosSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  2. Stanley v. Sterling Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  3. GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. Lee Chocolate CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  4. Knights of the Ku Klux Klan Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  5. American Surety Co. v. Peoples BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. LockhartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  2. Government Employees Insurance v. GatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Laughinghouse v. First of Georgia InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  4. Rosenberg v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. LockhartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API