Legal Opinion

Citron v. Hazeltine

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1961PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal based upon two grounds: (1) Failure to file a designation of transcript at the time of filing the notice of appeal; and (2) failure to deposit the required filing fee at the time of filing the notice of appeal. It will be necessary to consider only the second ground.

Judgment of nonsuit was entered March 1, 1961, and notice of appeal was filed with the clerk of the circuit court on March 24, 1961. The filing fee of $20 (ORS 21.010) was not deposited with the clerk at the time the notice of appeal was filed, nor until April 3, 1961, when a check for that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hilts v. HiltsOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  2. State v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Charles K. Spaulding Logging Co. v. RyckmanOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Hart v. PratherOregon Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States National Bank v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Thomas v. City of GainesvilleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  3. Ray v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. United States National Bank v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. United States National Bank v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonOregon Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API