Legal Opinion
Authentic Apparel Group, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 20, 2017No. 15-16CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Motion In Limine; Expert Disclosures; Fed. R. Evi. 701, 702; RCFC 26(a)(2); Distinction Between Lay and Expert Opinion Testimony.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE
WILLIAMS, Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion in limine to preclude Plaintiff from introducing expert testimony at trial that has not been properly disclosed as-required by Rule 26(a)(2)(B) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims. 1
Because Plaintiffs witnesses may testify based upon their industry experience to the extent allowed under Federal Rule of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Wyatt HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. JayyousiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Jean Farner, as Administratrix of the Estate of John W. Farner, Deceased v. Paccar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. YannottiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Tokai Corp. v. Easton Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Flying S. Land Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Science Applications International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025