Legal Opinion

Puleston v. Alderman

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 31, 1941PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

Suit was brought on a note held by a married woman and, upon demurrer by the defendant, an order was entered by the court sustaining the attack on the pleading because the real plaintiff did not join her husband in the suit. In the same order it was recited by the court that upon announcement of the ruling on the demurrer the plaintiff moved that the declaration be amended, the wife consenting, to show that the suit was brought by “Camilla Puleston, joined by her husband S. Puleston,” the declaration as originally filed having alleged that it was instituted by “Camilla Puleston, by Her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Livingston v. MaleverSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  3. La Floridienne, J. Buttgenbach & Co., Societe Anonyme v. Atlantic Coast Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1912
  4. Beresh v. Supreme Lodge Knights of HonorIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Haldeman v. SchuhAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Griffin v. WorkmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  2. Ogle v. GordonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  3. Aboandandolo v. VonellaSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  4. Estate of Eisen v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. Bay View Investments, Inc. v. GrigsbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API