Zeller v. Consolini
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The plaintiffs appeal1 from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendants, following the granting of the defendants’ motion to strike the plaintiffs’ amended complaint. In the first and third counts of the complaint,2 the plaintiffs sought damages for tortious interference with a business relationship and vexatious litigation, respectively.3 The plaintiffs *419claim that the trial court improperly concluded both that they had not been parties to certain underlying administrative proceedings and that, therefore, for purposes of the torts of interference with a business relationship…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Rainier's Dairies v. Raritan Valley Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Blake v. LevySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Vandersluis v. WeilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Label Systems Corp. v. Samad AghamohammadiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Rioux v. BarrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. DunicanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Zeller v. ConsoliniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Russo v. City of HartfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.