Legal Opinion
Holstein v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 29, 1992No. 91 C 5458PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Robert Holstein (“Holstein”) and Brian Grove (“Grove”), individually and on behalf of others, brought this declaratory judgment action against defendant City of Chicago (“City”). Count I, brought by Grove, and Count III, brought by Holstein, both allege that Chicago Municipal Code § 9-92-030, which governs when cars may be towed by the City, is unconstitutional because it affords the City the power to tow cars arbitrarily. Count II, brought by Grove, alleges that post-tow hearings that are held pursuant to Chicago…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Housing Authority for La Salle County v. Young Men's Christian Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Richard Graff v. City of Chicago, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Robert A. Holstein and Brian Grove, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. City of Chicago, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Yellow Cab Co. v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Cady v. South Suburban CollegeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- Scott v. Westlake Services, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.