Legal Opinion

Yellow Cab Co. v. City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 10, 1996No. 95 C 3383PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BUCKLO, District Judge.

On June 7, 1995, plaintiff, Yellow Cab Company (‘Yellow Cab”), filed its complaint against defendants, City of Chicago (the “City”) and Caroline 0. Shoenberger, who is the Commissioner of Consumer Services (the “Commissioner”). Yellow Cab’s complaint arises out of the Commissioner’s promulgation of final rules and regulations establishing maximum allowable lease rates for taxicabs (the “Lease Rate Regulations”), which permit Yellow Cab a 14 percent rate of return on its investment. Under the Lease Rate Regulations, taxicab owners may seek…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Duquesne Light Co. v. BaraschSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Covington & Lexington Turnpike Road Co. v. SandfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Spiegel, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dombrowski v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  2. Hunt v. DaleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  3. United States v. RayDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002
  4. Zummo v. City of Chi.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Dombrowksi v. The City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API