Legal Opinion · Dissent

Moreau v. Sylvester, Sylvester v. Moreau

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 4, 2014No. 2012-152 & 2012-154Published

1Dissent

Robinson, J.,

¶ 44. dissenting. Although I acknowledge that father presents this case as a challenge to Titchenal, I do not believe that the question actually raised by this case is whether “equity provides a jurisdictional basis for de facto parents to petition the family court for custody, parentage and visitation in the absence of a statutory right to do so, and notwithstanding the holding in Titchenal that equity confers no jurisdiction in the civil *205court for such claims.” See ante, ¶ 19. Nor do I believe that the question in this case is whether a third-party nonparent is entitled to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Bock v. GoldSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  3. Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  4. In re S.B.L.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  5. Clifford K. v. Paul S.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API