Legal Opinion

United States v. Eggen

United States Customs Court

Decided August 29, 1966No. A.R.D. 212; Entry No. 37863, etcPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Landis, Judge:

This case comes before us on an application for review of a decision and judgment rendered by Judge Ford in reappraisement (54 Cust. Ct. 508, Reap. Dec. 10901), holding that cost of production was the proper basis of dutiable value of certain imported ball bearings, as claimed by the plaintiffs below.

Originally, this case was heard and decided by the late Judge Jed Johnson (Oscar E. Eggen (American Express Co.) et al. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 694, Reap. Dec. 10013). Ten appeals for reap-praisement were consolidated for trial.

The merchandise involved herein consists of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. MassinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. WeckerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. United States v. Berben Corp.United States Customs Court · 1962
  4. Plywood & Door Manufacturers Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  5. D. C. Andrews & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Meadows Wye & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. United States v. Dana Perfumes Corp.United States Customs Court · 1974
  3. United States v. EggenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  4. Descoware Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API