Selsor v. Shelby
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BRADY, Commissioner.
The appellants filed suit to enjoin the respondents from continuing an alleged violation of restrictions governing the use of certain lots in a subdivision. Respondents entered a general denial and also pleaded laches, waiver, and estoppel. The trial court denied the relief sought and this appeal followed. We will hereafter refer to the parties by their designation ⅜ the trial court.
Under the rules of review governing actions of this nature this court’s duty is to hear the case de novo, and, giving due deference to the trial court’s findings, we are to reach our own…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Keiser v. WiedmerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
- Rosemann v. AdamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Palfrey v. KillianMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
- Mitchell v. Independent Stave Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1957
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lake Development Enterprises, Inc. v. KojetinskyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
- Pine Lawn Bank and Trust Company v. UrbahnsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- MacKey v. GriggsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Hasekamp v. Superior Equipment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- People Ex Rel. Fleming v. ConliskAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.