Legal Opinion
Larken Minnesota, Inc. v. Wray
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 5, 1995No. Civ. 3-93-589, 3-93-818 and 3-94-50PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MAGNUSON, Chief Judge.
These consolidated matters are before the Court with regard to the appropriate disposition of the two partnership properties following the failure of the Larken Interests 1 to close their purchase of those properties at a price of $39.35 million. This issue was originally presented to Magistrate Judge Jonathan G. Lebedoff in the form of a motion by the Pine Hill Interests 2 to declare those interests the purchasers of the two properties at the price of $35.5 million. The magistrate judge refused to endorse the Pine Hill Interests’ motion and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Transgo, Inc. v. Ajac Transmission Parts Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Domino Group, Inc. v. Charlie Parker Memorial FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Transportation, Inc. v. Mayflower Services, Inc., and Shahbaz HussainCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation v. Harry A. Pursche, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Crystal Restaurant Management Corp. v. CalcagniSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
- Blue Cross Blue Shield of R.I. v. McConaghy, 01-1570 (2002)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- National Credit Union Administration Board v. VanghDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019