Legal Opinion
Krauss v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 15, 1991No. 87 Civ. 5585 (RWS)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and intervenor Joint Venture Asset Acquisition (“JVAA”) have each moved for summary judgment dismissing the claims of plaintiff Melvyn Krauss (“Krauss”) and upholding their claims against Krauss. JVAA has also moved in the alternative for permission to amend its claims against Krauss and to assert a cross-claim for indemnity against FDIC. For the reasons set forth below, both summary judgment motions are granted.
The Parties
Krauss, a New York resident who holds a Ph.D. in economics, is a Senior Economics…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. GiammetteiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Castleglen, Inc. v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Joint Venture Asset Acquisition v. ZellnerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- In Re Woodstone Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
- In Re Woodstone Ltd. PartnershipUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.