Legal Opinion
Giacobbi v. Biermann
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 7, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-1492PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FLANNERY, District Judge.
This case comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion is granted.
Background
On October 13, 1987, Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Department of Labor (“DOL”) alleging a violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 by his employer, Vinnell Corporation (“Vinnell”). As a government contractor, Vinnell is governed by Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 793, which prohibits government contractors from discriminating…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Robert Robbins v. Ronald Reagan Robert Robbins v. Ronald ReaganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Quick v. United States Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards & TechnologyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Beverly Health & Rehabilitation Services, Inc. v. ThompsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- CHS Industries, LLC v. United States Customs & Border ProtectionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- NAACP, Jefferson County Branch v. U.S. Secretary of LaborDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994
- Greer v. ChaoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.