Legal Opinion

Strojnik v. Panera Bread Company

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 24, 2022No. 1:22-cv-00682Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PETER STROJNIK, Case No. 1:22-cv-00682-JLT-BAK (SAB) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12 RECOMMENDING DENYING v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED 13 IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND REQUIRING PANERA BREAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE FILING FEE 14 Defendant. (ECF No. 3) 15 FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE 16 17 18 19 I. 20 BACKGROUND 21 Plaintiff Peter Strojnik (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se,1 filed this civil action on June 6, 22 2022. (ECF No. 1.) The verified complaint asserts violations of (1) the Americans with 23…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API