Legal Opinion

St. Romes v. Pore

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 15, 1821PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On an application for a rehearing, in this case, which was determined in May last, ante 30, it was urged, that—

Any kind of defect in the thing sold, is not a ground for the action of redhibition ; such defects alone are considered as render the thing absolutely unfit for the purpose for which it was intended in commerce, or such as so far diminish its utility, or render it so inconvenient, that it is presumable, that if these defects had been known to the buyer, he would not have bought at all, or would have bought at a reduced price. Civil Code, 356, art. 67.

The seller is not accountable for…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brewer v. New Orleans Land Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  2. Dunlap v. WhitmerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  3. Walker v. AllenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
  4. State v. TreadawaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  5. Roussell v. HughesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API