Legal Opinion

State v. Treadaway

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 25, 1910No. 18,149PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans; Frank D. Chretien, Judge. Octave Treadaway and another were indicted for miscegenation, in violation of Act No. 87 of 1908, § 1, and from a judgment of acquittal the State appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtProyosty, J.

The indictment in this case charges that one of the defendants is a person of Caucasian or white race, and the other “a person of the negro or Mack race, to wit, an octoroon,” and that they “did cohabit together and live in concubinage,” in violation of section 1 of Act No. 87 of 1908, which reads as follows:

‘'Section 1. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Louisiana, that concubinage' between a person of the Caucasian or white race and a person of the negro or black race is hereby made a felony, and whoever shall be convicted thereof in any court of competent jurisdiction…

2Cases cited126 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Hall v. DeCuirSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Ward v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Clark v. Board of DirectorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  5. Cory v. CarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Girod v. Monroe Brick Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  2. State v. KramerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  3. Rice v. Gong LumMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Mullins v. BelcherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  5. State v. Bd. of School Com'rs of Mobile CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API