Legal Opinion
Land O'Lakes, Inc. v. United-Buckingham Freight Lines, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 3, 1973No. Nos. 4-71 Civ. 221 to 4-71 Civ. 238 and 4-71 Civ. 240Published
1Opinion of the Court
NEVILLE, District Judge.
In Land O’Lakes, Inc. v. United-Buckingham Freight Lines, Inc., 351 F.Supp. 102 (D.Minn.1972), this court stated the facts of this controversy in some detail and held that the defendant motor carriers must refund an as yet undetermined amount of excess freight charges exacted from the plaintiff Land O’Lakes in connection with certain freight shipments.1 The refunds in question when finally determined as to amount are to be ordered as a result of an Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) proceeding. The court found the refund orders enforceable as agreed to by the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Darnell-Taenzer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Sloss-sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. MindsSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Admiral-Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.