Legal Opinion

Russell v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1997No. 97-7PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

Several months after injuring his back at work, Appellant Bruce Russell (Russell) filed for workers’ compensation benefits for treatment of numbness in his extremities. A hearing examiner from the Office of Hearing Examiners (OAH) allowed his claim but ruled his health problems were not caused by a work-related injury and denied benefits. Russell petitioned for review of that decision, contending the hearing examiner did not have subject matter jurisdiction over a medically contested case, and the decision was not supported by substantial evidence.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Russell…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thomson v. Wyoming In-Stream Flow CommitteeWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Wyoming Steel & Fab, Inc. v. RoblesWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Pisano v. ShillingerWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Desotell v. State ex rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Taylor v. Wyoming Board of MedicineWyoming Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Worker's Compensation Claim of French v. Amax Coal WestWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Bando v. Clure Bros. FurnitureWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Lyles v. State Ex Rel. Division of Workers' CompensationWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Worker's Compensation Claim of Robbins v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division v. WrightWyoming Supreme Court · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API