Legal Opinion

R.E. Rodgers and Barbara Rodgers v. James G. Watt, Secretary of the Interior

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 28, 1984No. 80-3482PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge;

Appellants, R.E. Rodgers and Barbara J. Rodgers (the Rodgers), appeal from the district court’s grant of the government’s motion for summary judgment. In accepting the recommendation of the magistrate, the district court sustained an administrative decision by the Department of the Interior declaring five of the appellants’ mining claims null and void, because discovery of a valuable mineral deposit was not made pri- or to the land’s withdrawal from operation of the mining laws. On appeal, the Rodgers argue that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) and the Interior…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Andrus v. Charlestone Stone Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Barrows v. HickelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  4. United States v. An Article of Drug, Etc., and Palmer Chemical & Equipment Company, Inc., Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Alfred N. Verrue v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Robert B. Lara v. The Secretary of the Interior of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Dredge Corp. v. ConnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. Alaska Limestone Corp. v. HodelDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1985
  4. Lara v. SECRETARY OF INTERIOR OF UNITED STATESDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1986
  5. Dredge Corporation v. Kemp ConnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API