Legal Opinion
State v. Peterson
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 2, 1999No. AC 16689PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.
The defendant, Rodney M. Peterson, appeals from the judgments rendered following the *647denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) rejected his motion to withdraw his guilty plea without holding an evidentiary hearing and (2) advised him of the minimum sentences for the crimes to which he pleaded guilty. We affirm the judgments of the trial court.
The following facts are necessary for a proper resolution of this appeal. The defendant was arrested on two separate occasions and charged each time with…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. SilvaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. JordanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. JeudisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. LugoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.