Legal Opinion

Askew v. Rice

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1944No. 4798Published

1Opinion of the Court

THREET, Justice.

This is an action instituted by appellees against the appellant to recover upon a promissory note and for the foreclosure of a lien upon certain shares of stock in the Parquay Royalty Company Inc., attached to the note as security. From a. judgment in favor of appellees for the full amount of the note and the foreclosure of the lien, appellant appeals.

The only error assigned by appellant is that the court erred in denying defendant’s motion for continuance. In considering this question, it will be well to consider, briefly, the history of the case leading up to the time of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lovato v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. State v. RennerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Territory of New Mexico v. LobatoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Hall v. Florida State Drainage Land Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1925
  5. First Nat. Bank of Tucumcari v. LutzNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API