Legal Opinion

Kincar Franchise Inc. v. Estate of Carey

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 28, 1972PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

118 N.J. Super. 463 (1972)

288 A.2d 317

KINCAR FRANCHISE INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF,

v.

ESTATE OF THE LATE HAROLD CAREY, JACOB COHEN AND LOUIS DREZIN, EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE HAROLD CAREY, MILDRED CAREY, CAREY CHEVROLET, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND CAREY SYSTEMS, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided February 28, 1972.

Mr. S.M. Chris Franzblau and Mr. Gary L. Falkin appeared for plaintiff (Messrs. Beckerman, Franzblau and Cohen, attorneys).

Mr. Edward J. Abromson, appeared for defendant Mildred Carey (Messrs.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Matter of Zimmerman v. . CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Finsilver, Still & Moss, Inc. v. Goldberg, Maas & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. McKeeby v. ArthurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  4. Battle v. General Cellulose Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  5. Public Utility Workers v. Public Service Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hudik-Ross, Inc. v. 1530 Palisade Ave. Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  2. Wasserstein v. KovatchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API